Signatures change with time, pen and due to so many things. So anyone could identify the signature if made by genuine person or someone. Any little change with original will be clarified with source and highly secure. While digital are duplicated with perfection. So paper signature are better
By Sathya Narayanan @ July 07, 2015
I just can't trust the digital signatures, real signature on paper makes me feel more secure, but found more and more people are using digital ones, should I change with the world?
By Living in the OLD world on July 03,2015
I used to sign digitally with a scan over ten years ago. Switched back to paper, because each signature is unique, and a hand-signed original (with real pen ink) has more class. For things that don't require a personal touch then I don't sign at all, unless it's required... and if required, usually most bureaucracies haven't designed things to easily enable adding digital signatures anyway, manual is actually usually faster.
By Raymond Raymond on July 07,2015
Digital means we can easily share and enjoy cross devices, do the work on the go which is especially useful for businessman who need to travel a lot, just imagine you can do your work and sign the contract at any time and at any place.
By Thomas on July 02,2015
Most of the arguments put forward in favour of retaining the paper signature are retro preferences and not based on security issues. The move to electronic to me appears to be like the incoming tide: there's no way to prevent it ... and I welcome the digital revolution for a variety of pragmatic reasons.
By Adrian (Bristol) on July 07,2015
The absolute tyranny of bureaucracy is something that all effort should be made to be taken hold over. Given the obvious real world practical applicability of digital signatures over a old and tired paper pushing method is not only an obvious benefit as it is a practical key cost cutting measure to government institutions and corporations that spend more money than even worth thinking about employing what could effectively be described as unskilled labor to task. Anyone who contends that in this day an age paper signatures are a more practical use of corporate/public funds is not only paranoid, but also a RWNJ that needs to adapt to change.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar
------->>> Leave A Comment <<<-------